<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: concise, helpful critique of &#8220;The Shack&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2mites.com/2010/01/28/concise-helpful-critique-of-the-shack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2mites.com/2010/01/28/concise-helpful-critique-of-the-shack/</link>
	<description>spending it all, because He is our treasure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://2mites.com/2010/01/28/concise-helpful-critique-of-the-shack/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2mites.com/?p=592#comment-488</guid>
		<description>That was the best review I have read of the Shack. I appreciated that Keller refrained from completely demonizing the book and actually praised certain aspects of the story. I also appreciated how Keller avoided talking about Modalism and all the other &quot;heresys&quot; that are usually brought up in reviews of The Shack. I don&#039;t believe that those sorts of reviews for a book like The Shack, which was written for popular consumption, are particularly helpful. So, in my opinion, Keller&#039;s criticism are much more well-founded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the best review I have read of the Shack. I appreciated that Keller refrained from completely demonizing the book and actually praised certain aspects of the story. I also appreciated how Keller avoided talking about Modalism and all the other &#8220;heresys&#8221; that are usually brought up in reviews of The Shack. I don&#8217;t believe that those sorts of reviews for a book like The Shack, which was written for popular consumption, are particularly helpful. So, in my opinion, Keller&#8217;s criticism are much more well-founded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
